12 thoughts on “A roomful of cynics: Gristmill

  1. I agree that it’s important to point out the falsity of authority in cases like this, but as HalSF said in the comments there, it can become an ‘our authorities are bigger than yours’ match.
    It’s more important to dismiss the fallacy of authority altogether. It’s about the evidence.

    Like

  2. The only problem with the picture is that it misrepresents Heartland’s efforts and the speakers there. It might fit some of the other attendees.

    Head-in-sand indicates people not wanting to see, whereas a better image might be people trying to stir up a sandstorm in front of the hockey-stick so that no one *else* can see it.

    Like

  3. And here I thought that picture was Al Gore, James Hansen, and Michael Mann. I did not know that they were speaking at the conference.
    You are right with your heading. Grist is a roomful of Cynics/skeptics.

    Like

  4. John Mashey:

    I don’t agree with you fully. I’m sure there are some people speaking there who truly believe what they’re saying. That’s more a case of the blind leading the blind than willful misrepresentation.

    Mike D:
    I see what you did there!! Clever!

    Like

  5. The hockey stick is a nonsensical piece of propaganda. Let’s extend the ‘proxy’ record to today and see what happens! Oh… the spike ‘today’ completely vanishes. Tacking instrumental records on to ‘proxy’ records of dubious quality is bad science. And furthermore eliminating those proxy records from the graph after 1950, when it’d make much more sense to strengthen your case by letting the proxies agree with the instruments and show robust unprecedented warming, is just plain dishonest. If the tree rings showed the scary warming today, why not leave them in and shut us skeptics up? Oh. Right. Because tree rings aren’t good proxies in the first place, and the proxy record shows no discernible trend after 1950, with some even showing a DECREASE in temperature. But that’s all inconvenient and takes a while to explain. Better to scare people with graphs based on bad data and shoddy presentation. You are a joke, and the world is beginning to realize it.

    Like

  6. Well, Informed Person, ironically you are tremendously uninformed about the qualities and atributes of temperature proxys. Google it.

    Like

  7. And the church of AGW wonder why no one takes them seriously.

    To Mike D, if it were a photo of Hansen, Gore and mann you would see 3 people waving a really scary story in one hand whilst the other is in the cookie jar. Either that or 3 people with their heads up where the sun dont shine.

    Like

  8. No, Lowlander, I’ve looked in to it extensively. The proxies are, in a word, crap. Especially when you mess with the data after the fact. Don’t be silly.

    Like

  9. Seriously? –

    Can you provide a specific critique of why you think proxy measurements (all of them) are inadequate? Right now, you’re just dismissing them out of hand, calling them crap and leaving it at that. If you’ve actually looked into it extensively, you’ll be able to provide a detailed discussion of what you think is wrong.

    Hell, if you publish your results, you’ll probably become famous for single-handedly destroying the results and understanding of several branches of science.

    Of course, since your disagreement with the science is likely ideological, I don’t expect this to happen.

    Like

  10. Not all are inadequate. Just the ones that define the Mann hockeystick and the rest of the hockey team. Even though they claim to be ‘independent,’ the hockey team studies simply recycle different combinations of the same datasets, leaving a few out here and there. It’s a farce. Tree rings aren’t good proxies. The proxy record doesn’t show the current warming. Which is a very good reason to doubt the reliability of the tree ring record. You can handwave about this all you like, but if the proxy record extended until today showed the warming, they’d leave that part in and shut people like me up. Instead, they omit it and hope nobody will notice or question their reasoning for doing so.

    No, my disagreement is with the bad science itself. Attempting to paint me as something else is immature and uncalled for. Keep it up though. Ad homs are awesome!

    Like

  11. If tree-rings are egregiously unusable, they should be completely at odds with other proxies. However, all the proxy temperatures show the same general trend, though obviously with some variation (greatest in the tree-ring measurements, admittedly).
    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/paleolast.html
    http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/09/progress-in-millennial-reconstructions/

    So, you still have to demonstrate why all the proxy measurements are wrong if you want to so casually dismiss the hockey stick.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s